Aviation didn’t get safer because pilots got smarter. It got safer because we admitted memory is unreliable, ego is expensive, and a checklist read out loud catches things a checklist read silently doesn’t. Your closing process deserves the same treatment.

I fly an Airbus for a major U.S. carrier. 35 years in the cockpit, both in commercial and corporate aviation. The single most counterintuitive thing about commercial aviation is how aggressively low-tech the safety system actually is at the moment of execution. We have $200 million worth of technology in the airplane. We use it. And we still read a printed checklist out loud, one item at a time, with one pilot reading and one pilot responding, on every single flight. Pre-start. Before-taxi. Before-takeoff. After-takeoff. Cruise. Descent. Approach. Landing. Shutdown. The same items, the same words, every time, even when both of us could recite them in our sleep — because the version we recite from memory is, statistically, the one that gets things wrong.

Here is what title professionals tend to miss about that ritual: the checklist isn’t there to tell us what to do. We already know what to do. The checklist is there to make sure that on this particular flight, on this particular day, having had this particular kind of week, we actually did each thing. The act of reading out loud, with a second human responding, is the entire safety mechanism. The list is just the prompt.

Now look at the average title closing. The competent closer in your operation could probably recite their checklist in their sleep too. Trust account funded. Lender wires reconciled. Title commitment compared to current state of title. Endorsements verified. Survey exception cleared or not, and noted. CD reconciled to lender instructions. Seller and buyer documents pulled in the right order. Notary credentials current. Recording instructions confirmed. They know the list. So why is the closing they screwed up six months ago — the one that’s now a claim — sitting in your error file?

The answer is the same one aviation figured out fifty years ago. Memory is unreliable. Ego is expensive. A list read silently in your head, by the same person who knows the list, will skip the item that doesn’t feel important today. The list read aloud, with a second human (or a system) responding, won’t.

The pushback I get from title operators on this is predictable, and it’s always the same shape: we’re not pilots, our work is more nuanced, our customers don’t want us reading scripts at them, every closing is different. All of which is also true of every flight I’ve ever made, and none of which has stopped the industry I work in from achieving the safest decade of commercial aviation in history. The nuance lives in the judgment about what each item means in this specific transaction. The checklist guarantees the items themselves don’t get skipped.

What It Actually Looks Like in Title

The right closing checklist is not a 200-item document. It’s the 20 to 30 verifications that, when missed, account for 80% of the claims and 95% of the rework. It’s structured by phase: pre-closing, at-closing, post-closing. It has clear ownership — one person reads, another responds, and neither of them is the same person who originated the work. And it’s auditable: you can tell, three months later, that the checklist was actually run, item by item, and not signed at the end with everything pre-checked.

Where Software Fits

Software does not replace the checklist. That’s the trap most title-tech vendors fall into, including some of our competitors. What software is good at is automating the read-aloud. The system can pull current title state, present it side by side with the commitment, and force the closer to actively acknowledge each variance — not click through. The system can flag the endorsements that haven’t been verified against the underwriter’s current requirements. The system can require the second-pair-of-eyes step before recording instructions get released. None of this is the checklist; all of this is what makes the checklist run in a way that scales.

We build Electra Digital on this philosophy across the suite. The technology doesn’t replace your closer’s judgment. It does for your closing what the first officer does for me in the cockpit — it makes sure the items get read, the responses get given, and the things you already know not to skip actually don’t get skipped.

That’s the cockpit-and-closing-table parallel. I’ll only cash this analogy in once a quarter, because the moment you over-extend it, it stops landing.

Subscribe to the Electra Digital newsletter for more from the cockpit and the closing table →